Tools for a correct design and quality assessment of pragmatic randomizedcon trolled trials: PRECIS, PR-tool and Prag mascope to
Current Issues in Pharmacy and Medical Sciences Vol. 26, No. 3, Pages 292-295
KACZYŃSKI ŁUKASZ, SOLNICA BOGDAN
Department of Diagnostics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
Files to download
health technology assessment (HTA), PRECIS, PR-tool, Pragmascope tool, quality assessment
- Alford L.: On differences between explanatory and pragmatic clinical trials. N. Z. J. Physiother. 35, 12, 2007.
- Kaczyński L., Solnica B.: Pragmatic randomized controlled trials as a source of data in the assessment of effectiveness of medical technology. Prz Lek. 69, 703, 2012.
- Koppenaal T. et al.: Pragmatic vs. explanatory: an adaptation of the PRECIS tool helps to judge the applicability of systematic reviews for daily practice. J Clin Epidemiol. 64, 1095, 2011.
- Loudon K. et al.: Making clinical trials more relevant: improving and validating the PRECIS tool for matching trial design decisions to trial purpose. Trials. 14, 115, 2013.
- Macpherson H.: Pragmatic clinical trials. Complement Ther. Med. 12, 136, 2004.
- Möller H-J.: Effectiveness studies: advantages and disadvantages. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 13, 199, 2011.
- Riddle D.L. et al.: The Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS) instrument was useful for refining a randomized trial design: experiences from an investigative team. J Clin Epidemiol. 63, 1271, 2010.
- Thorpe K.E. et al.: A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. CMAJ. 180, E47, 2009.
- Thorpe K.E. et al.: A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 62, 464, 2009.
- Tosh G., Soares-Weiser K., Adams C.E.: Pragmatic vs explanatory trials: the pragmascope tool to help measure differences in protocols of mental health randomized controlled trials. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 13, 209, 2011.
- Treweek S., Zwarenstein M.: Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability. Trials 10, 37, 2009.